Skip to content

2015-03 Foreign Direct Investment per capita in Europe

    European countries are listed by the European Chamber according to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows per capita, based on the 2013 data published by the World Bank. The rate considers the capital used to acquire an ownership of at least 10%, in an enterprise of a country other than the one where the investors reside in.

    According to “Doing Business”, there is a strong correlation between FDI inflow and the degree of ease of doing business in a specific country. EuCham analyzes FDI per capita to highlight its relevance to business success.

    Download PDF

    EuCham Charts
    March 2015


    Foreign Direct Investment per capita in Europe

    1 Luxembourg 55,367
    2 Ireland 10,872
    3 Netherlands 1,911
    4 Austria 1,634
    5 Iceland 1,451
    44 Malta -4,414

    USD FDI per capita in 2013, World Bank, 2014
    44 European countries were considered

    • Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is a controlling ownership in an enterprise by a company based abroad
    • There is a strong correlation between FDI inflow per capita and the degree of ease in doing business with a specific country
    • Luxembourg attracts most of the foreign investments per capita, with USD 55,367 per resident
    • Following in the ranking are Ireland, Netherlands, Austria and Iceland
    • Malta positions at the bottom, facing a loss of USD 4,414 per resident in terms of foreign investments

    Source: eucham.eu/research

    Detailed Information

    EuCham – European Chamber lists the European countries according to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows per capita based on the 2013 data published by the World Bank. The rate considers the capital used to acquire an ownership of at least 10%, in an enterprise of a country other than the one where the investors reside in. According to “Doing Business”, there is a strong correlation between FDI inflow and the degree of ease of doing business in a specific country. EuCham analyzes FDI per capita to highlight its relevance to business success.

    Luxembourg is ranked top with USD 55,366.8 FDI inflow per capita, which are mainly concentrated in the banking and insurance sectors. The countries following in the top 5 are Ireland, Netherlands, Austria and Iceland. Surprisingly, Malta, which could count on an English-proficient labour force and privileged geographical position, facilitating trade in the Mediterranean area, occupies the bottom of the chart with a negative USD 4,414.4 per capita. This is due to the decline in tourism resulted from the 2008 worldwide crisis and the Libyan war.

    In conclusion, EuCham focused this month Chart on FDI inflow figures to highlight its relevance to a country’s economic growth and its impact on society welfare. Benefits for the local population include increased employment opportunities and improved infrastructures.

    Methodology

    A positive value of FDI per capita represents an inflow of foreign investment in a country’s economy distributed among its residents, whereas negative values indicate withdrawn investments.

    Table 1 has been created based on the values of the “Total Population” and “Foreign Direct Investment, net inflows” 2013 databases of World Bank (2014). For San Marino, Monaco and Liechtenstein data were not available.

    Business focus: Foreign Investment in Europe

    Migration has overflowed the political and economic debate over the past decades as the globalization of the job markets expands. However, its benefits, costs, issues and advantages are generally overlooked from a business perspective.

    Undoubtedly, immigration has proven to be highly beneficial for businesses and for SMEs. Yet, a lack of governmental intervention on a global and national scale cause the frequent occurrence of some issues, of which illegal immigration is the most severe. It puts businesses at risk and make ethical enterprises be outcompeted by unethical organization, which can benefit by hiring illegal immigrants at lower costs thus unfairly providing cheaper services. Other issues include the difficulty to assimilate immigrants into the work culture and language barriers.

    When considering a global expansion, countries with high immigration may be preferred due to their favourable conditions such as the provision of language and cultural knowledge that current staff might not possess. Moreover, the diversification of the workforce might foster innovation and protect from anti-discrimination laws.

    Furthermore, skilled immigrants represent an under-tapped talent pool of highly flexible, adaptable and loyal workers, ideal for expanding businesses. Unskilled immigration can also be beneficial for the national economy and enterprises, by providing a steady supply of candidates to fill job openings often neglected by native people.

    EuCham – European Chamber listed the European countries according to the migration rates, which indicates the difference between immigrants and emigrants of a country in a given year per 1,000 persons, based on data from Central Intelligence Agency (2014). As seen here by these metrics, SMEs could take advantage of the high migration inflows occurring in Cyprus, Luxembourg, Norway which by providing advantageous tax and bureaucratic laws attracting with immigration a stream of inflow capital which can ultimately stimulate the economy.

    Table 1: FDI Net Inflows per capita USD

    Rank Country FDI in USD Population FDI per capita
    1 Luxembourg 30,075,373,593 543,202 55366.8
    2 Ireland 49,960,134,752 4,595,281 10872.1
    3 Netherlands 32,109,654,413 16,804,224 1910.8
    4 Austria 13,843,770,472 8,473,786 1633.7
    5 Iceland 468,688,707 323,002 1451.0
    6 Spain 44,917,006,387 46,647,421 962.9
    7 Portugal 7,881,591,922 10,459,806 753.5
    8 Estonia 964,588,953 1,324,612 728.2
    9 Montenegro 446,490,330 621,383 718.5
    10 Germany 51,266,993,711 80,621,788 635.9
    11 Cyprus 607,038,885 1,141,166 531.9
    12 Norway 2,627,258,488 5,084,190 516.8
    13 Russia 70,653,718,709 143,499,861 492.4
    14 Czech Republic 5,006,911,507 10,521,468 475.9
    15 Albania 1,253,783,309 2,773,620 452.0
    16 Latvia 880,800,000 2,013,385 437.5
    17 Slovakia 2,148,266,702 5,414,095 396.8
    18 Denmark 1,597,210,042 5,613,706 284.5
    19 Azerbaijan 2,619,437,000 9,416,598 278.2
    20 Serbia 1,974,338,182 7,613,976 275.6
    21 Greece 2,945,417,938 11,032,328 267.0
    22 Bulgaria 1,887,670,064 7,265,115 259.8
    23 Lithuania 712,435,949 2,956,121 241.0
    24 Belarus 2,246,100,000 9,466,900 237.3
    25 Italy 13,126,395,561 59,831,093 219.4
    26 Georgia 949,335,750 4,476,900 212.1
    27 Romania 4,108,000,000 19,963,581 205.8
    28 Macedonia 376,454,351 2,107,158 178.7
    29 Turkey 12,918,000,000 74,932,641 172.4
    30 Croatia 588,376,068 4,252,700 138.4
    31 Armenia 370,196,773 2,976,566 124.4
    32 Ukraine 4,509,000,000 45,489,600 99.1
    33 France 6,480,400,817 66,028,467 98.1
    34 Bosnia & Herzegovina 315,018,539 3,829,307 82.3
    35 United Kingdom 4,831,445,402 64,097,085 75.4
    36 Moldova 249,040,000 3,559,000 70.0
    37 Poland -4,586,000,000 38,530,725 -119.0
    38 Slovenia -418,664,939 2,060,484 -203.2
    39 Belgium -3,268,505,983 11,195,138 -292.0
    40 Hungary -4,301,988,209 9,592,247 -434.7
    41 Sweden -5,119,205,196 9,592,552 -533.7
    42 Finland -5,296,740,409 5,439,407 -973.8
    43 Switzerland -8,179,472,592 8,081,482 -1012.1
    44 Malta -1,868,526,810 423,282 -4414.4

    Sources: World Bank (2014)
    EuCham Research Department – Compiled by Ms Mitsuko Takagi and Mr Luca Nazzicone 2015-02-27