The European Chamber lists the European countries which appear to have the best economic environment, with 46 nations considered in the analysis. The final scores result from the average between the DTF (Distance to Frontier) index of World Bank and the CPI (Corruption Perception Index) of Transparency International, since business integrity and transparency play an important role. In particular, the higher the average between these two values, the more favourable the country’s environment is.
Based on this study, Nordic countries rank at the top of the list and can be identified as the nations in which it is best to do business in. Given the variables taken into consideration, it is clear that EuCham score addresses the overall integrity and ethical issue of doing business together with its natural financial objective, also reflecting its long-term sustainability goals.
EuCham Research
July 2016
Best European countries for business 2016
Country | Score | |
1 | Denmark | 87,7 |
2 | Finland | 85,5 |
3 | Sweden | 85,4 |
4 | Norway | 84,3 |
5 | United Kingdom | 81,7 |
… | ||
46 | Ukraine | 45.0 |
EuCham data based on World Bank and Transparency International.
46 European countries were considered.
- Nordic countries rank at the top of the European countries that are best to do business in.
- The EuCham rating is calculated on the average of two different scores: Corruption Perception Index (CPI, Transparency International) and Distance to frontier score (World Bank).
- The EuCham score addresses the overall integrity and ethical issue of doing business together with its natural financial objective, reflecting its long-term sustainability goals.
Source: eucham.eu/research
Detailed information
The European Chamber ranks European countries based on their business environment. The ranking, named EuCham score, originates from the average of World Bank’s Distance To Frontier score and Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index.
An economy’s EuCham score is reflected on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the lowest performance and 100 represents the best performance. Denmark tops the ranking with a score of 88, followed by Finland, Sweden, Norway and United Kingdom.
Other researches, which don’t take into consideration corruption issues, show different results as they only reflect on the capacity of countries’ environments in order to address the corporate sector’s desire to create financial results. The ease of doing business is largely influenced by the effectiveness of regulations and by the time it takes to complete corporate transactions. EuCham considers integrity and transparency expectations as an equally important factor in the assessment.
Methodology
In order to assess European countries based on their business environment, EuCham blends two different scores: the DTF score of World Bank and the CPI score of Transparency International, since business integrity and transparency play an important role in a country’s’ environment.
The DTF – Distance To Frontier score by World Bank (from the Doing Business report) measures the distance of each country’s economy to the frontier, mirroring the best performance on each indicator across all economies (e.g. starting business, paying taxes, trading across borders, property registration). The difference is shown on a scale from 0 (lowest performance) to 100 (frontier); a score of 70 means that the economy is 30 points away from the frontier.
The Corruption Perception Index (CPI) from Transparency International was used to determine how corrupt each country’s public sector is seen to be on a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). A low score can be a sign of widespread bribery, lack of punishment for corruption, or a government not responding to social needs.
The EuCham score, used for the ranking, is the average of the CPI and the DTF score. A high score means the country is favorable to do business in, and the lowest score refers to the least favorable country to do business in.
Best European countries for business 2016
Figure 1: European Map Chart
Best European countries for business 2016
Figure 2: The EuCham Score
No data: Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino.
Source: World Bank 2016, Transparency International
EuCham Research Department
Best European countries for business 2016
Table 1: The EuCham Score
Ranking | EuCham score |
DTF score The World Bank |
CPI score Transparency Int. | ||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | EUCham Score | data 2014 | data 2015 | data 2014 | data 2015 | |
Denmark | 1 | 1 | – | 88.1 | 87.7 | 84.3 | 84.4 | 92 | 91 |
Finland | 2 | 2 | – | 85.0 | 85.5 | 81.0 | 81.1 | 89 | 90 |
Sweden | 3 | 3 | – | 84.2 | 85.4 | 81.4 | 81.7 | 87 | 89 |
Norway | 4 | 4 | – | 83.8 | 84.3 | 81.5 | 81.6 | 86 | 87 |
United Kingdom | 6 | 5 | ⬆ | 80.1 | 81.7 | 82.2 | 82.5 | 78 | 81 |
Netherlands | 7 | 6 | ⬆ | 79.5 | 81.5 | 76.0 | 75.9 | 83 | 87 |
Switzerland | 5 | 7 | ⬇⬇ | 81.0 | 81.0 | 76.0 | 76.0 | 86 | 86 |
Germany | 8 | 8 | – | 79.3 | 80.4 | 79.6 | 79.9 | 79 | 81 |
Iceland | 9 | 9 | – | 78.9 | 79.0 | 78.9 | 78.9 | 79 | 79 |
Austria | 11 | 10 | ⬆ | 75.2 | 77.2 | 78.4 | 78.4 | 72 | 76 |
Ireland | 10 | 11 | ⬇ | 76.4 | 77.1 | 78.9 | 79.2 | 74 | 75 |
Belgium | 13 | 12 | ⬆ | 74.2 | 74.8 | 72.4 | 72.5 | 76 | 77 |
Estonia | 14 | 13 | ⬆ | 74.1 | 74.7 | 79.3 | 79.5 | 69 | 70 |
Luxembourg | 12 | 14 | ⬇⬇ | 75.2 | 74.7 | 68.3 | 68.3 | 82 | 81 |
France | 15 | 15 | – | 72.3 | 73.0 | 75.5 | 76.0 | 69 | 70 |
Portugal | 16 | 16 | – | 70.2 | 70.3 | 77.4 | 77.6 | 63 | 63 |
Lithuania | 18 | 17 | ⬆ | 68.1 | 69.9 | 78.2 | 78.9 | 58 | 61 |
Poland | 17 | 18 | ⬇ | 68.2 | 69.2 | 75.4 | 76.5 | 61 | 62 |
Slovenia | 21 | 19 | ⬆⬆ | 65.8 | 67.8 | 73.7 | 75.6 | 58 | 60 |
Spain | 19 | 20 | ⬇ | 66.9 | 67.4 | 73.8 | 74.9 | 60 | 60 |
Latvia | 20 | 21 | ⬇ | 66.3 | 66.5 | 77.5 | 78.1 | 55 | 55 |
Cyprus | 22 | 22 | – | 65.2 | 66.4 | 67.4 | 71.8 | 63 | 61 |
Czech Republic | 25 | 23 | ⬆⬆ | 62.4 | 65.0 | 73.9 | 74.0 | 51 | 56 |
Georgia | 23 | 24 | ⬇ | 64.4 | 64.7 | 76.8 | 77.5 | 52 | 52 |
Slovakia | 26 | 25 | ⬆ | 62.4 | 63.3 | 74.7 | 75.6 | 50 | 51 |
Croatia | 28 | 26 | ⬆ | 60.3 | 61.9 | 72.5 | 72.7 | 48 | 51 |
Hungary | 24 | 27 | ⬇⬇⬇ | 63.2 | 61.8 | 72.5 | 72.6 | 54 | 51 |
Macedonia | 27 | 28 | ⬇ | 62.3 | 61.1 | 79.7 | 80.2 | 45 | 42 |
Romania | 31 | 29 | ⬆⬆ | 58.3 | 59.9 | 73.6 | 73.8 | 43 | 46 |
Malta | 29 | 30 | ⬇ | 59.3 | 59.9 | 63.7 | 63.7 | 55 | 56 |
Italy | 33 | 31 | ⬆⬆ | 57.4 | 58.0 | 71.7 | 72.1 | 43 | 44 |
Montenegro | 34 | 32 | ⬆⬆ | 56.5 | 57.9 | 71.1 | 71.9 | 42 | 44 |
Bulgaria | 30 | 33 | ⬇⬇⬇ | 58.3 | 57.4 | 73.6 | 73.7 | 43 | 41 |
Greece | 35 | 34 | ⬆ | 55.7 | 57.2 | 68.3 | 68.4 | 43 | 46 |
Turkey | 32 | 35 | ⬇⬇⬇ | 57.5 | 55.6 | 69.9 | 69.2 | 45 | 42 |
Armenia | 36 | 36 | – | 54.8 | 54.6 | 72.7 | 74.2 | 37 | 35 |
Serbia | 37 | 37 | – | 53.1 | 54.2 | 65.3 | 68.4 | 41 | 40 |
Belarus | 39 | 38 | ⬆ | 51.4 | 52.2 | 71.8 | 72.3 | 31 | 32 |
Moldova | 38 | 39 | ⬇ | 52.9 | 52.0 | 70.8 | 71.0 | 35 | 33 |
Bosnia & Herz. | 40 | 40 | – | 51.2 | 50.9 | 63.4 | 63.7 | 39 | 38 |
Kazakhstan | 43 | 41 | ⬆⬆ | 49.2 | 50.3 | 69.3 | 72.7 | 29 | 28 |
Russia | 44 | 42 | ⬆⬆ | 48.1 | 50.0 | 69.3 | 71.0 | 27 | 29 |
Kosovo | 42 | 43 | ⬇ | 49.6 | 49.6 | 66.1 | 66.2 | 33 | 33 |
Azerbaijan | 45 | 44 | ⬆ | 47.8 | 48.4 | 66.7 | 67.8 | 29 | 29 |
Albania | 41 | 45 | ⬇⬇⬇ | 49.8 | 48.3 | 66.7 | 60.5 | 33 | 36 |
Ukraine | 46 | 46 | – | 44.2 | 45.0 | 62.3 | 63.0 | 26 | 27 |
No data: Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino.
Source: World Bank 2016, Transparency International
EuCham Research Department